Translate complex capability into evidence AI systems can interpret.
Contractors often have strong operational evidence but fragmented public explanations. Verify Presence records whether selected AI answers understand capability, geography and project fit without turning accreditation or project history into an unsupported assurance.
The commercial problem
A buyer’s question may combine trade, risk, sector, location and project stage.
- Capabilities are hidden in project galleries or PDFs.
- Regional coverage is implied rather than stated.
- Accreditations appear without scope or date.
- Old trading names and subcontract services create ambiguity.
Example fixed prompts
The prompt set mirrors bounded procurement questions.
- Which contractors handle the defined specialist package in this region?
- Who has public evidence of work in the relevant building or sector context?
- What providers should a buyer investigate for this project type?
Evidence reviewed
The system records what is publicly supportable at the measurement date.
- Service and sector pages
- Project summaries and locations
- Accreditation records and policies
- Coverage, contact and company information
Likely evidence gaps
Gaps are prioritised by buyer relevance, not keyword volume alone.
- No concise capability boundary
- Unclear self-delivered versus partner work
- Missing regional evidence
- Unqualified safety, scale or outcome claims
Deliverables
Outputs support a controlled marketing or bid-information workflow.
- Prompt and answer register
- Capability and location consistency review
- Evidence-backed page changes
- Remeasurement with unresolved items retained
Limits
The service does not assess site safety, technical competence, financial standing or procurement eligibility.
- No contractor certification
- No guarantee of shortlisting
- No substitution for buyer due diligence
What to know before you begin
Does this prove competence?
No. It measures public representation and evidence consistency, not operational competence or compliance.
Can project PDFs be included?
They may be reviewed when public, attributable and within the agreed evidence scope, but format limitations are recorded.
Can multiple regions be compared?
Yes, using distinct prompts and clearly separated evidence so one region is not inferred from another.